« Trusting God with Marriage | Main | Responce to Comments on Tithe »

November 10, 2005

Tithe

23:44, I should be heading to bed. But I feel the urge to rant! Well, at least share my peace and thought process. I am hoping some of you intellectuals out there will take some time to dialog with me on this subject of the Tithe. Maybe I have theological mis-understanding or I'm just ignorant -- what do you think? {Maybe writing out what I think will help clarify things... well, take a moment and pray!)

There are few topics I love, Tithing is one of them. I'll paint the picture...

While serving as Stonebrook's Finance Overseer, I was charged with the task of informing various leaders that giving is down compared to last year and that we could be looking at upto $45,800 in budget cuts. In my e-mail I made the following comment, "However, church attendance is up. In my opinion, we need to be praying and challenging people to be faithful in giving/tithing."

So, later in the day, one of the leaders says to me, "You know tithing isn't commanded right?" I affirmed this statement (though I don't agree with it, I know our Pastor's would) and this person added, "You seem to always be concerned about the tithe" and we battered back and forth about what I actually said. Well I toned it down, challenging (not commanding) people to be faithful in 'giving/tithing'. (I used the word giving....) And we talked briefly how giving is a reflection of the heart. The leader wanted us to be sure to be teaching that, the heart matter. Which is fine and any time the Pastor's teach on it, the heart matter is always first. [Rightfully so, I might add.]

So in the New Covenant, sealed by Christ's blood, am I not to Tithe? The command was never explicitly repeated right? Hmmm... I wonder....

This really bugs me. I can't command someone to tithe. "O really?", I ask myself. So before I go off into a theological proof, (or at least in my mind it's a proof), let me share a brief back ground of myself.

Background: I've been serving in a financial/money management role for The Rock since Spring of 2000. I've been working for Stonebrook since Spring of 2002. Add that all up, I've been dealing with money related matters for the Kingdom of God for five years. The only reason I can say, at my age, I can do my job, is because the first three years serving The Rock, God pounded into me a heart about money, the Kingdom and stewardship that was directly from His hand. I recall those first few years, they were tough as God pounded, banged and beat on my heart into submission so that I could be in a position to do my job now. Hense forth, on this topic, I will admit, I'm a little fanatical. (Ask me more later if you want me to fill in more detail.)


Theological Reasoning #1:
This thought is rather new. I've got another line of reasoning, but this one came to me tonight, so I thought I would elaborate on it first.

Can anyone think of any moral law stated under the Old Covenant not explicitly repeated or strengthed in the New Covenant? I might be missing something, but I cannot think of one. In fact, Christ seemed to go the extra mile in making matters worse for the sinner. Adultry is the most noteable. Old Covenant law was "Do not Commit Adultry" (Duet. 5:18) Christ took it to the nth degree by saying, "Do not look lustfully" because when you do you are committing adultry in the heart. (Matthew 5:27-28)

Roughly speaking:
**Old Covenant - actions
**New Covenant - heart, motive and actions.

To take this a step further, if God's character is un-changing, then doesn't that mean the standard for right and wrong didn't change between Covenants? And this is the value of the Old Testament. To peer into the moral understanding of the law... (topic for another time.)

Is Tithing moral?

If yes, then it can't be revoked on a change of covenants for that violates the notion that God is unchanging in His character. Thus we can command poeple to Tithe.

If not, then we can't command people to tithe, or it might mean something else and not directly imply I cannot command people to tithe.

Actually this line of reasoning brought up a broader question, "Is choosing to or not to follow God a matter of moral choice or is it simply free choice devoid of moral consequences, just as picking chocolate over vanilla ice cream?"

If it is moral to follow God, wouldn't that imply my responce in following Him has moral implications?

If I'm making any sense, then I think you will see where I'm going. If not, then maybe I'm on the wrong track or not making sense at all.

Theological Reasoning #2:
This proof I rather prefer. Seems more strait forward, at least to me. Hopefully someone will illustrate where I'm off. (You might be wondering why I'm taking that stance, but it's hard to argue with an Elder who agrees that we cannot command to Tithe, so I want to be cautious in presenting a line of reasoning.) [But as you can tell, or will shortly, based upon my understanding of Scripture, I don't see how we can't command the Tithe.]

"Command those who are rich in this present world not to be arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth, which is so uncertain, but to put their hope in God, who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment. Command them to do good, to be rich in good deeds, and to be generous and willing to share." (I Timothy 6:17-18 NIV)

What standard of generosity should I use? 1% of gross income? 5%? 10%? $1, or maybe $100? Or is it $1,000,000?

If you take any class in appropiate Biblical interpretation, you would learn not to pull from extra-Biblical sources for a means of interpretation. So I'm forced to look at the Bible, the examples and other passages where it is clear about what it means to be generous.

So I'll turn to my favorite example. Please read Genesis 28.

Aside from the fact this example pre-dates Levitical Law, what is bare responce to an understanding of God's presence?
1) Fear (v17)
2) Alter (v18)
3) Vow (v20-22)
4) (as part of the vow) Tithe. (v22)

Levitical Law commanded the Tithe. So how in good conscience can we look at the command "Command them to be, ..., generous" and let it mean anything less than Tithe? The bare responce to God, for who He is, was to Tithe. Abraham did it, Jacob did it, why in the world would I not do like wise? Is Abraham not heralded as an exmple in Hebrews 11? {I'm making the point this isn't an example like David and Bathseeba that is a negative example. A negative example being one not meant to be followed but learned from.)

I suppose you could make the case that I Timothy 6:17-18 is solely addressing rich people. But that is so shaky (and seems to be poor exegesis in light of the context of the passage). Well, we can look to other commands of generosity. But needless to say, if you are living in America, even if you are dirt poor, you are most definitely, compared to the rest of the world, "rich in this world."

Hopefully I've provided enough material to outline my train of thought and reasoning without needing to do an indepth proof.

Let me know what you think.

-MTR

Posted by mtriley at November 10, 2005 11:52 PM

Comments

I'll add a pence.

You're right that the standard is actually higher in teh New Testament than in the Old Testament. We are to lay down ou lives for the brethren and the 1st century saints in Jerusalem gave so that no one was in need.

On the other hand, you're in no position to command anyone to do anything. You gotta trust in the Lord, bro, to move people's hearts. And keep preaching it with love and gentleness and respect.

Posted by: Dan at November 11, 2005 07:17 AM

I agree with Dan, though it frustrates me to no end to say it (nothing against you Dan). How can we call people to something biblical and good while not offending them? I've been going through this with my life group guys, isn't obedience demanded of us, and aren't grace and faith dead without it? But overall, it's true, we must build hearts.

Paul Abbot said in the Great Commission Workbook, "No man can live by another's convictions. When the pressure is on, he will 'throw in the towel' demonstrating that he was simply following what others had told him, not what he himself valued or believed to be true."

Posted by: Dustin Schuur at November 11, 2005 08:40 AM

Great post, Riley. Another verse came to mind...

Matt. 5:19 "Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven."

I know what you mean, and I share Dustin's frustration sometimes (and I'm certain that others have had that frustration for me) when I'm being disobedient (and sometimes belligerent and pugnacious), but I'm slow to accept truth until God convicts me.

Another verse:

1 Thess 2:11-12 "For you know that we dealt with each of you as a father deals with his own children, encouraging, comforting and urging you to live lives worthy of God, who calls you into his kingdom and glory."

When I think of a patient Father, I think of a man who sees childish things in his son/daughter, and desires to see Godly, adult habits replace those childish sins. But that often takes a long time and years of careful, patient instruction.

Since we live in a time where few children hear anything of tithing at home, and what they DO hear is usually the basic "This is how to get extra credit with God" version of why we should tithe. We have to remember that with the people we're leading, that many of God's commandments weren't taught to them growing up, and their learning curve is sometimes way ahead, and sometimes way behind us.

That doesn't call for any compromise or watering-down of the truth, but it DOES call for patience and love, and increased prayer that God might be moving mightily within us all, growing us up into the Godly men and women He desires us to become.

Whether it's tithing, struggles with anger, lust, taking oaths (ooo, thats one not talked about much, but badly abused), prayer, fasting, being judgemental of others, or any other pet sin that we want to keep close to our heart, it's still sin, and needs to be dealt with on a case by case basis with most people, and bathed in prayer.

That is, unless someone reads the Bible and just says straight-out "I'm not gonna do this, God can't make me..." Then punch 'em in the throat.

Just kidding... :D Have a nice day!

Posted by: nate at November 11, 2005 09:57 AM

I won't attempt to dissect your post, mainly because I don't think I am as smart as you :P. I just had a thought though... maybe God intentionally left the new testament vague so that teachers would not feel liberty to specifically command how tithing should look. If you teach generosity, it leaves more room for the Spirit to convict someone to do just that. To not just follow the command in the OT to tithe 10%, and thus be right with God, but to BE GENEROUS, according to the faith that you have. I think it opens it up more to give all that you can, and for some in the NT, that meant giving everything they owned.

Posted by: Wendy at November 11, 2005 11:56 AM


Ok, so I just started tithing, so I don't know how valid my thoughts are, as im a tithing noob, but here goes

I think a lot of times people get hung up on the 10% thing, and we get proud of ourselves when we give 10%, but we totally forget that we are still keeping 90%. Theres always a deeper heart to every law/rule/command. For me what tithing simply comes down to is trust, and I guess by my actions I haven't trusted God with my money until just a few weeks ago.

I enjoy food a lot, I end up spending a decent amount of money on food, how much more should i be concerned on spending money on "food" for the church body?

Posted by: TJ at November 11, 2005 12:10 PM

I had an additional thought too, if you don't mind.

I was wondering, are you taking into account the Ezekiel project giving and giving for Katrina and other stuff. Overall giving actually may be up?

And just to go along with Wendy and TJ, the 10% thing really is thrown out in the New Testament because we're supposed to give it all. You know, "love one another as I have loved you" (John 13:34).

Posted by: Dan at November 11, 2005 12:45 PM

To reply to you Dan, giving may be up, but our standard of measure is the Tithe. (At least until the Elders tell me otherwise.) The point of Hurricane Relief or Z37 is to raise additional funds beyond what is regularly given. And by and large, though there are a few exceptions, most who give to Z37 or Hurricane Relief, actually faithfully give to the tithe (not necessarily meaning it's a full Tithe), so in the sense that more people are actually giving is not implied by the dollar figure.

Things like Z37 or Hurrican Relief and be catalysts, but it's faithful, regular giving that is more important. I would and I'm sure the Elders would agree, that we'd like to see saints give first to the Tithe, and then if their means allow, give to the other things.

Posted by: Michael T. Riley at November 11, 2005 01:04 PM

Thanks to all who commented. I think part of my point was missed so I'm working on clarifying it. I'll be generating a new post, so stay posted. I appreciate the thoughts, insight and comments. Thanks for sharing! :)
-mtr

Posted by: Michael T. Riley at November 11, 2005 01:09 PM

Michael,

Thanks for writing about this. I don't think we talk about tithing enough. I think that in my desire to be sensitive to where the Holy Spirit is working, and to not bring a lot of obligations into a new believer's life, I hold off too long before talking about this topic.

I say that because every time I talk to someone about tithing, and they start doing it, so much blessing starts pouring out on their life that I kick myself for not telling them this would happen earlier. Without exception, tithing is a blessing to the giver; it's a purely good thing for those we know to hear about tithing.

So, thanks for writing.

Oh, and I actually believe Abraham's example of tithing (Gen 14) is one of the strongest supports for New Testament tithing. Not only was that before the Law, Abraham, the father of Israel, tithed to an archetype of Christ, Melchizedek. So, now that the law has been fulfilled, we revert to the same example -- tithing to Christ.

Posted by: Tony at November 11, 2005 04:52 PM

ooo, great point Tony! (about Abraham)

Posted by: nate at November 12, 2005 09:02 AM

Hi Michael,

I know what you're saying about hurricane vs. ezekiel vs. regular giving. Just pointing out that people perhaps are being even more generous from their finite resources and that perhaps that's a reason to be thankful.

Posted by: Dan at November 12, 2005 11:09 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?